Discover the World of Aphantasia

Can You Picture This?

Imagine a world where up to 4% of people can't create mental images. That's the reality of aphantasia, a fascinating variation in human cognition discovered in 2015. Aphantasia Network is your hub for understanding, exploring, and embracing life without a mind's eye.

Joining Aphantasia Network has changed my life! I really thought aphantasia was holding me back, but now I understand that image-free thinking is my superpower.

side profile of a women, thinking deeply and visualizing. Imagined with midjourney.

Latest Aphantasia Activity

Research
Stage 2 Registered Report: Propositional Thought Is Sufficient for Imaginal Extinction as Shown by Contrasting Participants With Aphantasia, Simulated Aphantasia, and Controls
Monzel, M., Agren, T., Tengler, M., Karneboge, J., & Reuter, M. (2025). Stage 2 registered report: Propositional thought is sufficient for imaginal extinction as shown by contrasting participants with aphantasia, simulated aphantasia, and controls. Psychophysiology, 62(1), e14756. doi:10.1111/psyp.14756
This study investigated whether people with aphantasia can benefit from imaginal exposure therapy - a common treatment for anxiety disorders that typically involves visualizing feared situations. The research team compared three groups: people with aphantasia, people without aphantasia, and a "simulated aphantasia" group who had their visualization abilities temporarily disrupted. The findings were remarkably promising. People with aphantasia can successfully benefit from imaginal exposure therapy, even without being able to visualize, and the therapy was equally effective across all groups. This suggests that "thinking about" rather than "seeing" the feared situation is sufficient for the treatment to work. Interestingly, people with aphantasia reported feeling less subjective fear throughout the experiment, despite showing similar physical stress responses. This reduced emotional distress might actually be beneficial, as it could make therapy less overwhelming and reduce dropout rates. The researchers used a fear conditioning experiment where participants learned to associate certain images with mild electric shocks. They then underwent "extinction training" (similar to exposure therapy) where they had to think about the images without any shocks. Their fear responses were measured through skin conductance (sweat response) and self-reported anxiety. This research challenges previous assumptions about the need for mental imagery in exposure therapy and opens up new possibilities for customizing treatment approaches. Most importantly, it suggests that people with aphantasia can fully benefit from visualization-based therapies, though they may experience them differently.
Research
Imageless imagery in aphantasia revealed by early visual cortex decoding
Chang, S., Zhang, X., Cao, Y., Pearson, J., & Meng, M. (2025). Imageless imagery in aphantasia revealed by early visual cortex decoding. Current Biology: CB. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2024.12.012
Scientists have traditionally believed that activity in the primary visual cortex directly relates to conscious visual experiences, including mental imagery. This study examined this relationship in people with aphantasia - who cannot voluntarily create mental images - by measuring brain activity patterns during both perception and attempted imagery. The research revealed several surprising findings: While both aphantasic and non-aphantasic individuals showed decodable brain activity during imagery attempts, people with aphantasia displayed distinctly different neural patterns. Their brain activity during imagery appeared on the opposite side than expected and couldn't be matched to their patterns during actual perception. Additionally, aphantasic individuals showed reduced brain response when physically viewing things compared to people without aphantasia. These results suggest that people with aphantasia do maintain some form of imagery-related representation in their visual cortex, but it contains transformed rather than absent sensory information. This challenges our fundamental understanding of how activity in the visual cortex relates to conscious visual experiences, indicating the relationship is more complex than previously thought.
Research
Objective priming from pre-imagining inputs before binocular rivalry presentations does not predict individual differences in the subjective intensity of imagined experiences
Bouyer, L. N., Schwarzkopf, D. S., Saurels, B. W., & Arnold, D. H. (2024). Objective priming from pre-imagining inputs before binocular rivalry presentations does not predict individual differences in the subjective intensity of imagined experiences. Cognition, 256(106048), 106048. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2024.106048
Researchers investigated whether binocular rivalry (BR) - where different images are shown to each eye - could provide an objective way to measure individual differences in mental imagery strength. Previous studies suggested that imagining an image before viewing competing images might influence what people see, but it wasn't clear if this effect reliably indicated how vividly someone could visualize. The study tested 77 participants using three methods: a standard questionnaire (VVIQ2) asking people to rate their visualization abilities, having people imagine specific patterns before showing different images to each eye, and testing how accurately people could spot small changes in images after imagining them. While imagining an image beforehand did influence what people reported seeing overall, this effect wasn't stronger in people who reported more vivid mental imagery. The ability to detect small changes in images after imagining them wasn't clearly linked to self-reported visualization strength. People's ratings of their visualization abilities were more consistent than the other measurements. The researchers conclude that while mental imagery can influence what we see, current binocular rivalry tests don't reliably measure individual differences in visualization ability. This highlights the ongoing challenge of developing objective ways to measure aphantasia and imagery strength. More research is needed to develop better measurement tools that could help tailor visualization-based therapies and techniques to different people's abilities.
Research
Content determination in dreams supports the imagination theory
Gregory, D. (2024). Content determination in dreams supports the imagination theory. Philosophical Studies. doi:10.1007/s11098-024-02250-3
A 2024 paper by Gregory explores fundamental theories about how dreams work, though it wasn't directly studying aphantasia or hyperphantasia. The research examines two competing theories about dreaming that may have implications for understanding these conditions. The "orthodox" theory suggests dreams involve hallucinations (false perceptual experiences) combined with actual beliefs. The alternative "imagination" theory proposes dreams involve sensory imagining and propositional imagining (the ability to imagine that something is true without any sensory representation, like understanding a fictional fact). Gregory provides two features of dreams that support the imagination theory. First, in dreams we often "know" things that aren't shown through sensory experience - like knowing you're a doctor without seeing or experiencing anything that indicates this. This suggests propositional imagining rather than actual beliefs. Second, dreams can skip through time in ways real experiences cannot. A dream might include climbing three mountains in different countries, showing only key moments while skipping the travel between. This temporal segmentation supports sensory imagining rather than hallucination, since actual perception (whether true or false) must be continuous. While this paper wasn't designed to study aphantasia or hyperphantasia, its theoretical examination of how dreams work could inform future research into these conditions. Gregory notes they aren't claiming dreams never involve hallucinations or beliefs, but rather that certain features of dreams are better explained by the imagination theory.