Discover the World of Aphantasia

Can You Picture This?

Imagine a world where up to 4% of people can't create mental images. That's the reality of aphantasia, a fascinating variation in human cognition discovered in 2015. Aphantasia Network is your hub for understanding, exploring, and embracing life without a mind's eye.

Joining Aphantasia Network has changed my life! I really thought aphantasia was holding me back, but now I understand that image-free thinking is my superpower.

side profile of a women, thinking deeply and visualizing. Imagined with midjourney.

Latest Aphantasia Activity

Research
Diversity makes the richness of humanity: The emergence and persistence of mental imagery after self-reported psilocybin truffles intake in an autistic woman with “blind imagination” (aphantasia): A 33-month retrospective case report
Rebecchi, K. (2025). “Diversity makes the richness of humanity”: The emergence and persistence of mental imagery after self-reported psilocybin truffles intake in an autistic woman with “blind imagination” (aphantasia): A 33-month retrospective case report. Journal of Psychedelic Studies. doi:10.1556/2054.2025.00320
This case study follows a 34-year-old autistic woman with lifelong aphantasia who experienced vivid mental imagery for the first time after consuming psilocybin truffles. Before taking psilocybin, she scored 16 on the Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire (the minimum score indicating no mental imagery). Immediately after her first psilocybin experience, her score jumped to 80 (the maximum), and importantly, the effects persisted long after the psychedelic wore off. Twelve months later, her score was 59, and at 33 months it had increased to 68, which is above the general population average. She reported being able to manipulate images in her mind, zoom in and out, and break down colors - experiences that were completely new to her. The research suggests psilocybin may work by altering brain connectivity patterns, particularly between visual processing areas and regions involved in conscious awareness. While this is just one person's experience and needs much more research, it raises questions about how we understand and classify aphantasia. The participant emphasized that she never felt disabled by her aphantasia, viewing it instead as a different way of experiencing the world rather than a deficit. She developed effective strategies and describes herself as methodical and creative. This perspective challenges the idea that aphantasia needs to be "cured" and suggests we should focus on understanding cognitive diversity rather than pathologizing different ways of thinking.
Research
Impoverished recall of sensory details along infrequently travelled routes in aphantasia
Li, A., Arrieta, M., Levine, B., & Rosenbaum, R. S. (2025). Impoverished recall of sensory details along infrequently travelled routes in aphantasia. Memory (Hove, England), 1–13. doi:10.1080/09658211.2025.2507948
Research shows how people with aphantasia remember and navigate familiar environments. Scientists studied over 220 participants, comparing those with aphantasia to those with typical mental imagery, using questionnaires about navigation skills and detailed interviews about routes they travel regularly. The results challenge assumptions about aphantasia and memory. People with aphantasia performed just as well as others when describing familiar routes they travel frequently—recalling the same amount of spatial details (like distances and directions), landmarks, and even sensory information (sounds, smells, textures). They also reported similar confidence in their overall navigation abilities and used comparable strategies for getting around. A difference showed up with less familiar routes. When describing places they rarely visit, people with aphantasia recalled fewer sensory details compared to those with typical imagery. This suggests they may rely on different memory strategies for frequently traveled routes—possibly converting visual experiences into verbal or factual memories rather than storing them as mental images. These findings offer reassurance to people with aphantasia: your spatial memory works well, especially for familiar environments. The research suggests that while you may process and store spatial information differently, you develop effective compensatory strategies that allow you to navigate successfully. This adds to growing evidence that aphantasia doesn't mean impaired memory—just different ways of remembering and experiencing the world around you.
Research
Aphantasia does not affect veridical and false memory: Evidence from the DRM paradigm
Pauly-Takacs, K., Younus, S., Sigala, N., & Pfeifer, G. (2025). Aphantasia does not affect veridical and false memory: Evidence from the DRM paradigm. Consciousness and Cognition, 133(103888), 103888. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2025.103888
Researchers at Leeds Beckett University conducted a intriguing study comparing how people with aphantasia and typical imagers remember word lists, using a well-known psychology experiment called the DRM paradigm where 198 participants heard lists of related words (like "door," "glass," "pane" for the theme "window") and were specifically told to visualize each word as they heard it. The researchers expected that people with aphantasia would perform worse since they can't create mental images, and that they might be less susceptible to "false memories" – remembering words that weren't actually presented but were related to the theme. Surprisingly, the results showed no significant differences between aphantasic and typical participants in either accurate recall or false memory generation, with both groups remembering about 57% of the actual words and falsely recalling about 40% of the theme words that were never presented. However, when looking at individual differences across all participants, those with more vivid imagery did show slightly better memory for real words but also made more memory errors. This research suggests that people with aphantasia may use alternative strategies to compensate for their lack of visual imagery, achieving similar memory performance through different cognitive pathways, challenging assumptions about how mental imagery affects memory and highlighting the remarkable adaptability of the aphantasic mind.
Research
Diverse Minds: Exploring Individual Differences in Visual Imagery and Special Cases
DeKock, K. (2025). Diverse minds: Exploring individual differences in visual imagery and special cases. The Confluence, 4(1). doi:10.62608/2150-2633.1069
This study explores the wide range of human experiences with visual imagery—from no imagery at all (aphantasia) to extremely vivid imagery (hyperphantasia). Visual imagery refers to the ability to picture things in the “mind’s eye,” and while most people can do this to some degree, the intensity varies greatly. Researchers examined how mental imagery connects to memory, learning, creativity, and emotion. People with hyperphantasia often have highly detailed mental pictures that can enhance creativity but may also increase emotional sensitivity or distress, especially when recalling negative experiences. On the other end, individuals with aphantasia tend to rely more on logic and facts than mental pictures. This can make emotional recall or visualization-based learning more difficult, but many adapt well and excel in fields like science or math. To study these differences, researchers used self-report questionnaires (where participants describe their own imagery experiences) and performance tasks. While self-reporting has limitations, it remains one of the best tools available for now. The study also highlighted that personality, gender, and brain structure might all play a role in how vivid someone's imagery is. Understanding these individual differences helps researchers, educators, and clinicians better support people across the imagery spectrum. The paper calls for more research, especially on hyperphantasia and the “in-between” experiences, to better understand how our inner worlds shape our outer lives.
Research
Mental imagery through the lens of aphantasia
Scholz, C. O. (2025). Mental imagery through the lens of aphantasia. Mind & Language. doi:10.1111/mila.12560
A debate has emerged in aphantasia research: could people who can't consciously visualize actually have "unconscious" mental imagery happening in their brains? Philosopher Bence Nanay proposed this possibility, suggesting that aphantasics might still generate visual representations without being aware of them. To test this theory, researchers used brain imaging technology to observe the minds of people with aphantasia and typical visualizers during imagery tasks. They looked for "shared representations"—matching brain patterns between imagination and actual seeing. In typical visualizers, these patterns overlapped significantly, like two puzzle pieces fitting together. However, in people with aphantasia, the brain patterns were completely different between seeing and imagining, even though their brains were still active during imagery attempts. The research also explored whether aphantasics might have unconscious imagery triggered by sounds or other senses. While some brain activity occurred, it didn’t show the same signature patterns as conscious visual processing. Interestingly, when researchers tested the Stroop effect (where reading color words interferes with naming ink colors), people with aphantasia showed a reduced effect, supporting the idea that mental imagery normally plays a role in this task. The conclusion challenges Nanay’s theory: people with aphantasia don’t appear to have unconscious visual imagery. Instead, they likely use entirely different cognitive strategies, such as verbal or spatial reasoning, to accomplish tasks that others solve through mental pictures.