Aphantasia Logo
Back to all research
Aphantasia Logo

Building awareness and understanding of aphantasia through research, education, and community support.

About

  • What is Aphantasia?
  • What is Hyperphantasia?
  • Take Assessment
  • Getting Started
  • Newsletter
  • About Us
  • Contact

Community

  • Premium Membership
  • Find support
  • Discussions
  • Events
  • Visualize

For Professionals

  • Overview
  • Free Introduction
  • Counselor Training
  • Educator Training
  • List Your Practice
  • Pricing & Bundles

Resources

  • Articles & Stories
  • Videos & Interviews
  • Aphantasia Course
  • FAQs

Research

  • Research Library
  • Participate in Studies
  • Recruitment Services

© 2026 Aphantasia Network. All rights reserved.

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
Aphantasia Logo
Back to all research
Aphantasia Logo

Building awareness and understanding of aphantasia through research, education, and community support.

About

  • What is Aphantasia?
  • What is Hyperphantasia?
  • Take Assessment
  • Getting Started
  • Newsletter
  • About Us
  • Contact

Community

  • Premium Membership
  • Find support
  • Discussions
  • Events
  • Visualize

For Professionals

  • Overview
  • Free Introduction
  • Counselor Training
  • Educator Training
  • List Your Practice
  • Pricing & Bundles

Resources

  • Articles & Stories
  • Videos & Interviews
  • Aphantasia Course
  • FAQs

Research

  • Research Library
  • Participate in Studies
  • Recruitment Services

© 2026 Aphantasia Network. All rights reserved.

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
Ask AI About This Paper
Ask AI About This Paper

Phenomenological Studies of Visual Mental Imagery: A Review and Synthesis of Historical Datasets

DOI: 10.3390/vision7040067
Tags:
VisualizationHyperphantasiaHypophantasia
Marks, D. F. (2023). Phenomenological studies of visual mental imagery: a review and synthesis of historical datasets. Vision, 7(4), 67. doi:10.3390/vision7040067

Abstract

This article reviews historically significant phenomenological studies of visual mental imagery (VMI), starting with Fechner in 1860 and continuing to the present. This synthesis of diverse VMI phenomenological studies in healthy adults serves as a unique resource for investigators of individual differences, cognitive development and clinical and neurological conditions. The review focuses on two kinds of VMI, “memory imagery” and “eidetic imagery”. Ten primary studies are drawn from three periods of the scholarly literature: early (1860–1929), middle (1930–1999) and recent (2000–2023). It is concluded that memory and eidetic imagery are two forms of constructive imagery, varying along a continuum of intensity or vividness. Vividness is a combination of clarity, colourfulness and liveliness, where clarity is defined by brightness and sharpness, colourfulness by image saturation and liveliness by vivacity, animation, feeling, solidity, projection and metamorphosis. The findings are integrated in a template that specifies, as a tree-like structure, the 16 properties of VMI vividness in healthy adult humans. The template takes into account the weight of evidence drawn from the accounts and reveals an extraordinary degree of consistency in reported VMI characteristics, revealed by specialized studies of healthy adult humans across time, space and culture.

Authors

  • David F. Marks3

Phenomenological Studies of Visual Mental Imagery: A Review and Synthesis of Historical Datasets

DOI: 10.3390/vision7040067
Tags:
VisualizationHyperphantasiaHypophantasia
Marks, D. F. (2023). Phenomenological studies of visual mental imagery: a review and synthesis of historical datasets. Vision, 7(4), 67. doi:10.3390/vision7040067

Abstract

This article reviews historically significant phenomenological studies of visual mental imagery (VMI), starting with Fechner in 1860 and continuing to the present. This synthesis of diverse VMI phenomenological studies in healthy adults serves as a unique resource for investigators of individual differences, cognitive development and clinical and neurological conditions. The review focuses on two kinds of VMI, “memory imagery” and “eidetic imagery”. Ten primary studies are drawn from three periods of the scholarly literature: early (1860–1929), middle (1930–1999) and recent (2000–2023). It is concluded that memory and eidetic imagery are two forms of constructive imagery, varying along a continuum of intensity or vividness. Vividness is a combination of clarity, colourfulness and liveliness, where clarity is defined by brightness and sharpness, colourfulness by image saturation and liveliness by vivacity, animation, feeling, solidity, projection and metamorphosis. The findings are integrated in a template that specifies, as a tree-like structure, the 16 properties of VMI vividness in healthy adult humans. The template takes into account the weight of evidence drawn from the accounts and reveals an extraordinary degree of consistency in reported VMI characteristics, revealed by specialized studies of healthy adult humans across time, space and culture.

Authors

  • David F. Marks3
Aphantasia Logo

What This Study Is About

This research looks back at over 160 years of history to understand how people experience visual mental imagery—the ability to "see" pictures in the mind. It explores how these inner experiences vary from person to person, ranging from those with aphantasia (no mental imagery) to those with "photographic" or eidetic memory.

How They Studied It

The researcher reviewed ten major historical studies conducted between 1860 and 2023. These studies included detailed personal accounts, questionnaires, and experiments. By comparing the experiences of hundreds of people across different eras and cultures, the researcher identified 16 specific characteristics that define how vivid a mental image feels, such as its brightness, color, and how long it lasts.

What They Found

The study found that mental imagery is not a single "on or off" switch but a constructive process that varies wildly between individuals. Key findings include:
  • Vividness is complex: It isn't just about how "clear" a picture is; it also involves how much effort it takes to hold the image and whether the image can move or change.
  • Consistency over time: Despite being from different centuries, people describe their inner worlds using very similar terms, suggesting these differences are a fundamental part of human nature.
  • The "Photographic" Myth: The research suggests that even "photographic" memory (eidetic imagery) is a creative process of the brain rather than a literal camera-like recording.

What This Might Mean

This suggests that aphantasia and hyperphantasia (extremely vivid imagery) are part of a natural spectrum of human experience. It highlights that our "inner lives" are highly personal; two people can look at the same object but remember it in completely different ways. However, because this study relies on people describing their own thoughts (phenomenology), there is always some uncertainty in how accurately words can capture a private mental experience.

One Interesting Detail

In the 1860s, Gustav Fechner—one of the fathers of psychology—discovered he had very poor mental imagery himself. He found that he could only "see" dim, fleeting images and was surprised to learn that others could see internal pictures as clearly as if their eyes were open.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain errors. Always refer to the original paper for accuracy.
Most-Cited Researchers
Top 10 researchers by number of papers published in Aphantasia
1

Joel Pearson

35
2

Merlin Monzel

30
3

Adam Zeman

20
4

Rebecca Keogh

17
5

Martin Reuter

16
6

Juha Silvanto

14
7

Paolo Bartolomeo

11
8

Carla Dance

10
9

Jianghao Liu

9
10

Fraser Milton

9
Recruit the largest aphantasia cohort on earth

97.4K+ users & subscribers across the imagery spectrum, plus 1.5M+ survey responses in our dataset. Skip the recruitment bottleneck and run your study with the community we've built for a decade.

Partner with us